Comparative score · CHI
44.3latest · 2026 Q2
Higher = worse (harm/risk-style index)
Δ Quarter-on-quarter
-1.1
vs. previous quarter
Δ Year-on-year
-4.2
vs. same quarter, 1y ago
vs. 5-yr average
-11.9
5-yr avg 56.2
5-yr percentile
5th
higher rank = worse
Consumer Harm Index · CHI

How much harm are consumers experiencing right now?

CHI is the launch-day metric of the observatory: a regulator-grade gauge of real consumer damage — financial loss, fraud, service failure, product issues and inconvenience — built from early complaint data. Higher = more harm.

Current reading · 2026 Q2
44.3
/ 100
Moderate harm

Unlike CVI (exposure) or MRI (systemic risk), CHI measures harm that has already occurred. It is the fastest indicator to compute from early complaint flows and the most useful for triggering regulatory action.

FL · w 30%
Financial losses
FR · w 22%
Fraud incidents
SF · w 20%
Service failures
PR · w 18%
Product issues
IC · w 10%
Inconvenience
CHI history · 2020 Q1 – 2026 Q2

Harm trajectory through pandemic, cedi crisis & recovery

Data vintage: 2020 Q1 – 2026 Q2 · live from nces_metrics

Reference lines mark the Elevated (55) and Severe (70) harm bands. Note the 2020 Q2 pandemic spike and the 2022 Q4 peak during the cedi/inflation crisis, followed by the steady decline as the IMF programme stabilised prices.

How CHI relates to the other indices

CHI vs. CVI

CVI measures exposure — how vulnerable consumers are to harm. CHI measures harm that has already happened. CHI is a lagging confirmation of what CVI projects forward.

CHI vs. MRI

MRI measures systemic risk in the marketplace. CHI is the downstream consequence at the household level. Persistent gaps between MRI rising and CHI flat typically signal that regulators are absorbing risk before it reaches consumers.